Message 65577 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	rhettinger
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum, pitrou, rhettinger
Date	2008-04-17.06:43:37
SpamBayes Score	0.0
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1208414619.13.0.577694998653.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
No need to get hung-up on the hash function. I can fix that up after a checkin and use something simple like: hashvalue = (startprime1+seqlen) prime2+step. That doesn't involve object creation and it produces the same hash value for range(5,10,2) and range(5,9,2) which are equivalent.

No need to get hung-up on the hash function.  I can fix that up after a 
checkin and use something simple like: hashvalue = (start*prime1+seqlen)
*prime2+step.  That doesn't involve object creation and it produces the 
same hash value for range(5,10,2) and range(5,9,2) which are equivalent.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-07-26 13:55:27	georg.brandl	set	spambayes_score: 0.75568 -> 0.0
2008-04-17 06:43:39	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.75568 -> 0.75568 recipients: + rhettinger, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, pitrou, benjamin.peterson
2008-04-17 06:43:39	rhettinger	set	spambayes_score: 0.75568 -> 0.75568 messageid: <1208414619.13.0.577694998653.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-17 06:43:38	rhettinger	link	issue2603 messages
2008-04-17 06:43:37	rhettinger	create