Message 65520 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	belopolsky
Recipients	amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, gvanrossum
Date	2008-04-15.15:47:15
SpamBayes Score	0.023014015
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1208274436.81.0.619450285469.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
The patch does not add unit tests for hash(range(..)). I would actually test that hash(range(a,b,c)) == hash((a,b,c)) for various values of a, b, and c. A nit-pick: while I personally like the coding style with line breaks before binary ops, python C style appears to be the opposite.

The patch does not add unit tests for hash(range(..)).  I would actually 
test that hash(range(a,b,c)) == hash((a,b,c)) for various values of a, 
b,  and c.

A nit-pick: while I personally like the coding style with line breaks 
before binary ops, python C style appears to be the opposite.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-04-15 15:47:17	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.023014 -> 0.023014015 recipients: + belopolsky, gvanrossum, georg.brandl, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson
2008-04-15 15:47:16	belopolsky	set	spambayes_score: 0.023014 -> 0.023014 messageid: <1208274436.81.0.619450285469.issue2603@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-04-15 15:47:16	belopolsky	link	issue2603 messages
2008-04-15 15:47:16	belopolsky	create