Message 63072 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	orsenthil
Recipients	gawain, orsenthil, tzot
Date	2008-02-27.15:41:37
SpamBayes Score	0.06787847
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1204126899.23.0.538555012508.issue2195@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I don't think this is a valid issue. If you browse through the RFC 1808 you will find that. 1) For net_loc information it refers to a broad section 1738 and we wont specifically find any information on port number in that. 2) But, have a look at the BNF Representation of the net_loc net_loc = *( pchar \| ";" \| "?" ) pchar = uchar \| ":" \| "@" \| "&" \| "=" There it dismisses this issue. The port number is a property of the scheme in the absolute URL notation. so, urlparse.urlparse('foo.bar.com',8088).scheme would give you the port. If someone can validate my reasoning, then we can close this issue.

I don't think this is a valid issue. If you browse through the RFC 1808
you will find that.
1) For net_loc information it refers to a broad section 1738 and we wont
specifically find any information on port number in that.
2) But, have a look at the BNF Representation of the net_loc

net_loc     =  *( pchar | ";" | "?" )
pchar       = uchar | ":" | "@" | "&" | "="

There it dismisses this issue.

The port number is a property of the scheme in the absolute URL
notation. so, urlparse.urlparse('foo.bar.com',8088).scheme would give
you the port.

If someone can validate my reasoning, then we can close this issue.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2008-02-27 15:41:39	orsenthil	set	spambayes_score: 0.0678785 -> 0.06787847 recipients: + orsenthil, tzot, gawain
2008-02-27 15:41:39	orsenthil	set	spambayes_score: 0.0678785 -> 0.0678785 messageid: <1204126899.23.0.538555012508.issue2195@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-27 15:41:38	orsenthil	link	issue2195 messages
2008-02-27 15:41:37	orsenthil	create