This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author belopolsky
Recipients belopolsky, benjamin.peterson, georg.brandl, loewis, vdupras
Date 2008-02-24.00:19:00
SpamBayes Score 0.11630788
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1203812341.22.0.0855967807271.issue2144@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> dict doesn't dynamically bind any calls; to
> properly replace the semantics of dict, you
> have to implement *all* API.

What was the rationale for this decision?  To me it looks like a hold-
over from the time when dicts were not subclassable.

I agree, this is a topic for python-ideas rather than bug-track, but if 
you could point me to any prior discussions on this issue, it would help 
me to either formulate a specific proposal or drop the issue before more 
electrons are sacrificed.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-02-24 00:19:01belopolskysetspambayes_score: 0.116308 -> 0.11630788
recipients: + belopolsky, loewis, georg.brandl, benjamin.peterson, vdupras
2008-02-24 00:19:01belopolskysetspambayes_score: 0.116308 -> 0.116308
messageid: <1203812341.22.0.0855967807271.issue2144@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-24 00:19:00belopolskylinkissue2144 messages
2008-02-24 00:19:00belopolskycreate