This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rbp
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, rbp, rhettinger, zanella
Date 2008-02-23.14:57:41
SpamBayes Score 0.020441238
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1203778663.25.0.305914319696.issue2149@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
For what it's worth, I do think this is an issue. As it currently
stands, not only does the module silently accept invalid values, but the
mutex issue exists (and is also silently ignored) if an object returning
dynamic values is passed as maxsize. IMHO, the waters are already muddy,
it's just that the mud is blue so everything seems alright :)

I think zanella's patch is the way to go, even if it requires adding a
setter method.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-02-23 14:57:43rbpsetspambayes_score: 0.0204412 -> 0.020441238
recipients: + rbp, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, zanella
2008-02-23 14:57:43rbpsetspambayes_score: 0.0204412 -> 0.0204412
messageid: <1203778663.25.0.305914319696.issue2149@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-02-23 14:57:42rbplinkissue2149 messages
2008-02-23 14:57:42rbpcreate