This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, exarkun, rhettinger, theller
Date 2008-01-27.18:58:16
SpamBayes Score 0.14874676
Marked as misclassified No
Message-id <1201460297.6.0.656026597414.issue1941@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Today, I carefully looked through every change in my patching. I asked
myself "Does this do the same things in the same order as the original?"
and "Could exceptions cause the code to function differently?" They only
changes were when the block which used the file was not in a try finally
block so if an exception were raised, it the file would be closed. The
with statement of course removes this problem. So, I do believe the
patch is "semantically neutral." I would, however, not mind if another
set of eyes examined it.
History
Date User Action Args
2008-01-27 18:58:17benjamin.petersonsetspambayes_score: 0.148747 -> 0.14874676
recipients: + benjamin.peterson, theller, rhettinger, exarkun, Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes
2008-01-27 18:58:17benjamin.petersonsetspambayes_score: 0.148747 -> 0.148747
messageid: <1201460297.6.0.656026597414.issue1941@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2008-01-27 18:58:16benjamin.petersonlinkissue1941 messages
2008-01-27 18:58:16benjamin.petersoncreate