Message 58467 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	gvanrossum
Recipients	christian.heimes, gvanrossum, nascheme, noam, rhettinger, tim.peters
Date	2007-12-11.20:43:26
SpamBayes Score	0.038878012
Marked as misclassified	No
Message-id	<1197405806.3.0.732915191463.issue1580@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
I'd be willing to require eval(repr(x)) == x only for platforms whose float input routine is correctly rounding. That would make the current patch acceptable I believe -- but I believe you think there's a better way in that case too? What way is that? Also, I'd rather not lock out non-IEEE-754 platforms, but I'm OK with dropping the above roundtripping invariant there.

I'd be willing to require eval(repr(x)) == x only for platforms whose
float input routine is correctly rounding.  That would make the current
patch acceptable I believe -- but I believe you think there's a better
way in that case too?  What way is that?

Also, I'd rather not lock out non-IEEE-754 platforms, but I'm OK with
dropping the above roundtripping invariant there.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2007-12-11 20:43:26	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.038878 -> 0.038878012 recipients: + gvanrossum, tim.peters, nascheme, rhettinger, christian.heimes, noam
2007-12-11 20:43:26	gvanrossum	set	spambayes_score: 0.038878 -> 0.038878 messageid: <1197405806.3.0.732915191463.issue1580@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2007-12-11 20:43:26	gvanrossum	link	issue1580 messages
2007-12-11 20:43:26	gvanrossum	create