Message55648
Ahh, my mistake then. I misunderstood what was going on.
Thanks,
Dan
On 9/4/07, Martin v. Löwis <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
>
> Martin v. Löwis added the comment:
>
> Why do you think so? The documentation is correct as it stands;
> dummy_threading should be used when thread is not present, not when
> threading is not present (as threading will always be present, it just
> won't import when thread is not present).
>
> ----------
> nosy: +loewis
> resolution: -> invalid
> status: open -> closed
>
> __________________________________
> Tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue1103>
> __________________________________
> |
File name |
Uploaded |
unnamed
|
dthomasset,
2007-09-04.21:43:58
|
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-09-04 21:43:59 | dthomasset | set | spambayes_score: 0.00228284 -> 0.0022828425 recipients:
+ dthomasset, loewis |
2007-09-04 21:43:59 | dthomasset | link | issue1103 messages |
2007-09-04 21:43:59 | dthomasset | create | |
|