This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients
Date 2007-02-15.11:53:54
SpamBayes Score
Marked as misclassified
Message-id
In-reply-to
Content
Speed measurements show a significant speed up over trunk & Python 2.4 for module/class level code:

(Python 2.4)$ python -m timeit -s "seq=range(1000)" "[[x for x in seq] for y in seq]"
10 loops, best of 3: 239 msec per loop
(Python 2.x trunk)$ ./python -m timeit -s "seq=range(1000)" "[[x for x in seq] for y in seq]"
10 loops, best of 3: 193 msec per loop
(Python 3000)$ ./python -m timeit -s "seq=range(1000)" "[[x for x in seq] for y in seq]"
10 loops, best of 3: 176 msec per loop

This is almost certainly due to the variables and the list object becoming function locals.

There is a slowdown inside a function (but we are still faster than Python 2.4):

(Python 2.4)$ python -m timeit -s "seq=range(1000)" -s "def f(): return [[x for x in seq] for y in seq]" "f()"
10 loops, best of 3: 259 msec per loop
(Python 2.x trunk)$ ./python -m timeit -s "seq=range(1000)" -s "def f(): return [[x for x in seq] for y in seq]" "f()"
10 loops, best of 3: 176 msec per loop
(Python 3000)$ ./python -m timeit -s "seq=range(1000)" -s "def f(): return [[x for x in seq] for y in seq]" "f()"
10 loops, best of 3: 185 msec per loop
History
Date User Action Args
2007-08-23 15:56:35adminlinkissue1660500 messages
2007-08-23 15:56:35admincreate