Message 415576 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	iritkatriel
Recipients	ChrisBarker, Pam.McANulty, berker.peksag, ezio.melotti, iritkatriel, mark.dickinson, michael.foord, r.david.murray, rbcollins, rhettinger
Date	2022-03-19.22:09:59
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1647727799.77.0.570842169332.issue27198@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to

Content
To summarize the discussion: There were objections to adding assertClose, but more agreement for adding an option to assertAlomstEqual that does the equivalent. Chris was to come back with an implementation (that was in 2016). Are we still pursuing this or shall we close the issue?

To summarize the discussion:

There were objections to adding assertClose, but more agreement for adding an option to assertAlomstEqual that does the equivalent.

Chris was to come back with an implementation (that was in 2016).

Are we still pursuing this or shall we close the issue?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2022-03-19 22:09:59	iritkatriel	set	recipients: + iritkatriel, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, berker.peksag, Pam.McANulty, ChrisBarker
2022-03-19 22:09:59	iritkatriel	set	messageid: <1647727799.77.0.570842169332.issue27198@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2022-03-19 22:09:59	iritkatriel	link	issue27198 messages
2022-03-19 22:09:59	iritkatriel	create