Message41077
Logged In: YES
user_id=31435
A performance hit compared to what? There are half a
dozen variations stacked up now. _Py_CheckInterval is
back to 10 in the latest patch, and perhaps that has
something to do with it.
_Py_CheckInterval needn't be delcared volatile, BTW; i.e.,
take the "volatile" out of
+ PyAPI_DATA(volatile int) _Py_CheckInterval;
I can't time this today, but you should be just as keen to
get x-platform verification when claiming a performance hit
as when claiming a performance boost. Chances are that it
will slobber all over the place across compilers; ceval is
extremely touchy. I'm sitting on a major slowdown under
MSCV6 after the SET_LINENO thing, and I'm not panicked
about that <wink>. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 15:15:00 | admin | link | issue602191 messages |
2007-08-23 15:15:00 | admin | create | |
|