This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author MFH
Recipients MFH, docs@python, veky, zach.ware
Date 2021-10-07.18:15:14
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1633630514.52.0.0328011911991.issue45393@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
option 1 looks most attractive to me (and will also look most attractive in the rendering, IMHO -- certainly better than "await" "x", in any case).

P.S.: OK, thanks for explanations concerning 3.6 - 3.8. I do understand that it won't be fixed for these versions (not certain why not if possible at no cost), but I do not understand why these labels must be removed. The bug does exist but should simply be considered as "nofix" for these versions (or not), given that it's not in the "security" category. The fact that it won't be fixed, for whatever reason, should not mean that it should not be listed as existing, there.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-10-07 18:15:14MFHsetrecipients: + MFH, docs@python, zach.ware, veky
2021-10-07 18:15:14MFHsetmessageid: <1633630514.52.0.0328011911991.issue45393@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-10-07 18:15:14MFHlinkissue45393 messages
2021-10-07 18:15:14MFHcreate