This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients brandtbucher, jaraco, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2021-09-17.03:58:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1631851119.27.0.970065286126.issue43413@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
> Subclass of set can now define a __new__() method with 
> additional keyword parameters without overriding also __init__().

Is there any use case for this?   Offhand, I can't think of any reason.

The new code in set.__init__ is somewhat opaque and is likely slower, so I prefer the previous code unless there is a legitimate use case being served.
History
Date User Action Args
2021-09-17 03:58:39rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, jaraco, serhiy.storchaka, brandtbucher
2021-09-17 03:58:39rhettingersetmessageid: <1631851119.27.0.970065286126.issue43413@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-09-17 03:58:39rhettingerlinkissue43413 messages
2021-09-17 03:58:39rhettingercreate