This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author flavianhautbois
Recipients bob.ippolito, dhimmel, ezio.melotti, flavianhautbois, methane, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2019-07-27.10:49:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1564224543.61.0.21387322225.issue29636@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
So what do we do about this? 

Two possibilities:
1. We merge PR 9765 and close PRs 345 and 201, as 9765 seems more straighforward and was already approved. 9765 should be resubmitted to be merged since the base repo does not exist anymore, I could do that.
2. We consider that this is out of scope for Python, and since jq is widely used, it does not make a lot of sense to include it. We should then close all PRs to keep our pull requests clean

I suggest going with 2
History
Date User Action Args
2019-07-27 10:49:03flavianhautboissetrecipients: + flavianhautbois, rhettinger, bob.ippolito, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, methane, serhiy.storchaka, dhimmel
2019-07-27 10:49:03flavianhautboissetmessageid: <1564224543.61.0.21387322225.issue29636@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2019-07-27 10:49:03flavianhautboislinkissue29636 messages
2019-07-27 10:49:03flavianhautboiscreate