This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Julian
Recipients Julian, ezio.melotti, methane, rhettinger
Date 2019-03-28.13:45:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CABJQSkmwgr4tUQtDh1XDPPA824swRZFZRDeFwVTE4H633CqWkw@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1553779102.97.0.789893521847.issue12445@roundup.psfhosted.org>
Content
Well, surely there are reasonable semantics :), because dict.values ==
dict.values was comparable before we had view objects.

It's been awhile since I filed this, and still seems rather silly that:

>>>> {"a": "foo"}.values() != {"a": "foo"}.values()
True

On Thu, Mar 28, 2019 at 9:18 AM Inada Naoki <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Inada Naoki <songofacandy@gmail.com> added the comment:
>
> There is no reasonable semantics for values view.
> Keep it unimplemented.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +inada.naoki
> resolution:  -> rejected
> stage: patch review -> resolved
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <https://bugs.python.org/issue12445>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2019-03-28 13:45:51Juliansetrecipients: + rhettinger, ezio.melotti, methane
2019-03-28 13:45:51Julianlinkissue12445 messages
2019-03-28 13:45:51Juliancreate