This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author augustogoulart
Recipients Valectar, augustogoulart, belopolsky, docs@python, fhackdroid, p-ganssle, taleinat, xtreak
Date 2018-10-18.10:33:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1539858839.21.0.788709270274.issue27741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
As far as I can see, every time something changes on datetime.strptime(), it will invalidate that section of the documentation. On the other hand, I believe the comparison with datetime(*(time.strptime(date_string, format)[0:6])" is interesting and valuable to keep.
Given that, instead of "This is equivalent to [...]", I would suggest something like:
"This is similar to [...], but datetime.strptime() is better since it retains both microseconds and timezone data."
History
Date User Action Args
2018-10-18 10:33:59augustogoulartsetrecipients: + augustogoulart, belopolsky, taleinat, docs@python, Valectar, p-ganssle, fhackdroid, xtreak
2018-10-18 10:33:59augustogoulartsetmessageid: <1539858839.21.0.788709270274.issue27741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2018-10-18 10:33:59augustogoulartlinkissue27741 messages
2018-10-18 10:33:59augustogoulartcreate