Message318213
> I did look at the code :-)
I also looked at the code. I had to do so to understand why the example output was not "as expected." ;)
> I don't agree about the example in the documentation, it is a clear
> demonstration about how to use the API in general and AFAIK is not
> intended to show how priorities work.
Although I came to the same conclusion as you regarding both the fact and the reason the output was correct, I respectfully disagree that the example is clear. It is not. Yes, the example, as written, is intended to demonstrate the API -- which consists of several functionalities *including priority*. If this were not so, the example would not be passing different priority values with the same delay value.
I suggest re-opening this issue as a documentation bug and modifying the example to use enterabs instead of enter.
Respectfully,
M Fisher |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-05-30 21:54:49 | mfisher | set | recipients:
+ mfisher, rhettinger, ronaldoussoren, r.david.murray, sahilmn |
2018-05-30 21:54:49 | mfisher | set | messageid: <1527717289.59.0.682650639539.issue33590@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-05-30 21:54:49 | mfisher | link | issue33590 messages |
2018-05-30 21:54:49 | mfisher | create | |
|