Message310448
@Eric, given the breadth of change introduced in the PR (including adding a new extension), I think it would be best if at all possible to get it in for beta 1 if we can resolve the review comments in time. If necessary and if there are no objections from other core developers, I would be willing to consider making an exception and allowing it into beta 2 as long as it remains a private interface. If it looks like it won't be in releasable shape by then, I think you should hold off for 3.8; doing otherwise would be unfair to others and to our downstream beta users / testers, for example, even if it is private, adding a new extension and setup.py changes potentially affect downstream packagers. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2018-01-22 22:46:19 | ned.deily | set | recipients:
+ ned.deily, ncoghlan, eric.snow, yselivanov, steve.dower |
2018-01-22 22:46:19 | ned.deily | set | messageid: <1516661179.2.0.467229070634.issue32604@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2018-01-22 22:46:19 | ned.deily | link | issue32604 messages |
2018-01-22 22:46:19 | ned.deily | create | |
|