Message303504
I happened to run across this in my old email inbox.
It's embarrassing to realize how wrong I was in submitting the report.
Reading it with fresh eyes, your original makes sense.
I don't know what I was thinking.
> On Jul 11, 2016, at 2:10 PM, Raymond Hettinger <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
>
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>
> I think all of these read fine as-is though I would change "argument first" to "first argument" or just "argument". Adding the word "positional" is a distractor from what the comments are trying to communicate.
>
> The version numbering is normally done with a directive and outside of the examples.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +rhettinger
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue27484>
> _______________________________________ |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-10-02 00:37:19 | RufusVS | set | recipients:
+ RufusVS, rhettinger, r.david.murray, docs@python, zach.ware |
2017-10-02 00:37:19 | RufusVS | link | issue27484 messages |
2017-10-02 00:37:18 | RufusVS | create | |
|