Message 301599 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	benjamin.peterson, eric.snow, jkloth, ncoghlan, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov
Date	2017-09-07.17:58:21
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1504807101.21.0.781513389924.issue30860@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Regarding the accidental exposure of _Py_CheckRecursionLimit, the main active usage of the stable ABI that we're aware of is Riverbank's C/C++ binding generator for PyQt: http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/directives.html#directive-%Module (see the use_limited_api option for the linked directive) I checked with Phil Thomson (sip's maintainer), and the bindings sip generates don't use either of the public macros that access this nominally private value.

Regarding the accidental exposure of _Py_CheckRecursionLimit, the main active usage of the stable ABI that we're aware of is Riverbank's C/C++ binding generator for PyQt: http://pyqt.sourceforge.net/Docs/sip4/directives.html#directive-%Module (see the use_limited_api option for the linked directive)

I checked with Phil Thomson (sip's maintainer), and the bindings sip generates don't use either of the public macros that access this nominally private value.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-09-07 17:58:21	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, benjamin.peterson, jkloth, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov
2017-09-07 17:58:21	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1504807101.21.0.781513389924.issue30860@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-09-07 17:58:21	ncoghlan	link	issue30860 messages
2017-09-07 17:58:21	ncoghlan	create