Message 298624 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	ncoghlan
Recipients	brett.cannon, cstratak, eric.smith, eric.snow, frenzy, ncoghlan, torsava
Date	2017-07-19.01:05:23
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1500426323.59.0.726838300645.issue29144@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Are you able to confirm the version of setuptools involved is the same in both cases? The reason I ask is that the interaction between pkg_resources-style namespace packages and native ones is known to be temperamental (https://packaging.python.org/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#creating-a-namespace-package), and the suggested resolution is to make sure that if you're using pkg_resources namespaces at all then all packages contributing to the namespace should be using them.

Are you able to confirm the version of setuptools involved is the same in both cases?

The reason I ask is that the interaction between pkg_resources-style namespace packages and native ones is known to be temperamental (https://packaging.python.org/guides/packaging-namespace-packages/#creating-a-namespace-package), and the suggested resolution is to make sure that if you're using pkg_resources namespaces at all then *all* packages contributing to the namespace should be using them.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2017-07-19 01:05:23	ncoghlan	set	recipients: + ncoghlan, brett.cannon, eric.smith, eric.snow, cstratak, torsava, frenzy
2017-07-19 01:05:23	ncoghlan	set	messageid: <1500426323.59.0.726838300645.issue29144@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-07-19 01:05:23	ncoghlan	link	issue29144 messages
2017-07-19 01:05:23	ncoghlan	create