Message298581
Why not just do the following:
>>> from collections import namedtuple
>>> Point = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])
>>> Point._source
"from collections import namedtuple\nPoint = namedtuple('Point', ['x', 'y'])\n"
>>>
The docs make it seems as if the primary use case of the _source attribute is
to serialize the definition. Returning a source which produces a class with
different performance/memory characteristics goes against that. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-07-18 10:53:41 | lazka | set | recipients:
+ lazka, gvanrossum, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, methane, serhiy.storchaka, xiang.zhang, JelleZijlstra |
2017-07-18 10:53:41 | lazka | set | messageid: <1500375221.13.0.139110490736.issue28638@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-07-18 10:53:41 | lazka | link | issue28638 messages |
2017-07-18 10:53:41 | lazka | create | |
|