This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients ShiftedBit, gdr@garethrees.org, r.david.murray
Date 2017-06-04.16:42:17
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1496594537.73.0.233423884797.issue30564@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Not only is it conforming, it is required, since the primary use (originally) of the base64 module was in the email package, where generous interpretation of the input is the standard.

This does not mean that adding a strict mode would be out of line, but that would be an enhancement request, and would require some discussion about the API.

I'm going to close this issue as not a bug.  If you want to submit an enhancement proposal, please do so in a new issue.  You'll probably want to wait for the design discussion to resolve before (re)writing the code :)
History
Date User Action Args
2017-06-04 16:42:17r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, gdr@garethrees.org, ShiftedBit
2017-06-04 16:42:17r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1496594537.73.0.233423884797.issue30564@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-06-04 16:42:17r.david.murraylinkissue30564 messages
2017-06-04 16:42:17r.david.murraycreate