This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients cheryl.sabella, docs@python, rhettinger
Date 2017-06-03.23:31:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1496532710.52.0.439493184102.issue30538@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Is it code churn to replace the old style string formatting
> or is that something else that should be done as clean-up?

Let's leave it as is.  Old-style formatting is still valid and is not going away.   We consciously decided not to sweep through the docs change the string formatting style.  Also, since both occur quite a bit in the wild, it is is useful for the docs to show some of both.
History
Date User Action Args
2017-06-03 23:31:50rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, docs@python, cheryl.sabella
2017-06-03 23:31:50rhettingersetmessageid: <1496532710.52.0.439493184102.issue30538@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-06-03 23:31:50rhettingerlinkissue30538 messages
2017-06-03 23:31:50rhettingercreate