Message294516
The old error of tuple.index(x): x not in tuple seemed very confusing to me. It was also harder to quickly understand what the program was doing wrong. This saves people a second pass through the program under the debugger because they can just see what the invalid value was.
The reason I am explicitly calling repr instead of using %R is that I didn't want to call repr twice if I didn't need to. If people think that is fine the format can just be tuple.index(%R): %R not in tuple instead. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-05-25 22:41:20 | llllllllll | set | recipients:
+ llllllllll, brett.cannon |
2017-05-25 22:41:20 | llllllllll | set | messageid: <1495752080.24.0.264186476964.issue30477@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-05-25 22:41:20 | llllllllll | link | issue30477 messages |
2017-05-25 22:41:20 | llllllllll | create | |
|