Message291849
> it already raises a TypeError with a clear message
This is more to my point: I found the TypeError message not clear at all.
From my prospective, I was using a future object returned from an asyncio function to call another asyncio function, yet that function was telling me it could only use a future with it.
Though I eventually figured out what was going on, I think that a more clear message at that moment would have been very helpful to me. And I think other users who benefit from this was well.
A better warning/wording for the API would be helpful as well, but I don't think it fully suffices the problem. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-04-18 23:20:53 | crenwick | set | recipients:
+ crenwick, yselivanov |
2017-04-18 23:20:53 | crenwick | set | messageid: <1492557653.68.0.65386597588.issue30098@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-04-18 23:20:53 | crenwick | link | issue30098 messages |
2017-04-18 23:20:53 | crenwick | create | |
|