This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients Mariatta, docs@python, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2017-03-28.07:07:24
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1490684844.36.0.115779519104.issue29928@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
When I wrote the documentation <https://docs.python.org/dev/reference/lexical_analysis.html#f-strings>, I think I tried to avoid “f-string”, being jargon, and used more formal terminology from PEP 498 instead. But I agree they more than regular literals.

Serhiy do you have a link/message-id/etc of the Python-dev discussion? All I found with Google was <https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/3k969r/lets_find_a_better_name_for_fstrings/>. One other goal is to differentiate these from other formatted strings, such as from str.format and percent formatting.

* formatted strings (doesn’t differentiate from str.format, etc)
* string interpolations
* string expressions
* string comprehensions (apparently too far removed from set comprehensions)
* Maybe format(ted) string displays? (parallelling list etc displays)
History
Date User Action Args
2017-03-28 07:07:24martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka, Mariatta
2017-03-28 07:07:24martin.pantersetmessageid: <1490684844.36.0.115779519104.issue29928@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2017-03-28 07:07:24martin.panterlinkissue29928 messages
2017-03-28 07:07:24martin.pantercreate