Message29009
're' seems to have serious performance trouble with
nested Kleene stars in the regular expression, if the
matched text is fairly long. Attached is an example,
naturally arising in some LaTeX parsing [admittedly not
the only way to do it], along with a text generator
parameterized by a repetition count n. Here is simple
timing data on a Pentium 4 1.5GHz with 1.5GB RAM as a
function of n:
[...]
n=4: 0:00:00.015000
n=5: 0:00:00.032000
n=6: 0:00:00.140000
n=7: 0:00:00.594000
n=8: 0:00:02.203000
n=9: 0:00:08.859000
n=10: 0:00:39.641000
n=11: 0:02:44.172000
n=12: 0:10:23.500000
This seems far slower than it should be, but I don't
know the algorithm used by 're'. Is this behavior
expected? If so, should it be optimized away by
changing the algorithm?
The generated text consists of a few lines of preamble,
then a variable number n of copies of a partiuclar
line, followed by a few lines of postscript. The first
line of the postscript causes the regular expression
*not* to match, and 're' spends a long time to find
that out. Removing that line from the postscript, and
causing the regular expression to match, makes the
program run instantly.
I get the same behavior on Python 2.4 and 2.5b1, on
Windows and Linux, and with re.sub and re.search. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2007-08-23 14:40:58 | admin | link | issue1515829 messages |
2007-08-23 14:40:58 | admin | create | |
|