Message289306
Thank you, Josh, that's a very good point.
One can be expected to have the correct spelling when using attribute access.
So the two accesses that make sense for a _missing_ call would then be:
- by-value lookup (e.g. Label(1))
- by-name lookup (e.g. Label['redapple'])
Sound reasonable? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-09 16:47:58 | ethan.furman | set | recipients:
+ ethan.furman, barry, eli.bendersky, josh.r |
2017-03-09 16:47:58 | ethan.furman | set | messageid: <1489078078.81.0.0800784763296.issue29752@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-09 16:47:58 | ethan.furman | link | issue29752 messages |
2017-03-09 16:47:58 | ethan.furman | create | |
|