Message289241
Could that perhaps be intentional? Attribute access seems like something where the developer would be explicitly naming a single, hard coded, canonical name for the type, while string construction seems like something where you're getting a string from "somewhere" (user input, which is always terrible) and you'd want to have a way to handle invalid input.
The documentation is so sparse as to be useless for determining intent:
_missing_ – a lookup function used when a value is not found; may be overridden
I wouldn't view Label.redapple as an attempt to "find" anything, it's just simple attribute access. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-08 15:31:21 | josh.r | set | recipients:
+ josh.r, barry, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman |
2017-03-08 15:31:21 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1488987081.46.0.920819335458.issue29752@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2017-03-08 15:31:21 | josh.r | link | issue29752 messages |
2017-03-08 15:31:21 | josh.r | create | |
|