This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author viniciusd
Recipients rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, viniciusd
Date 2017-03-01.17:43:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CACb0x=YSxLZbN2zANvZomG-C5E2zqd3qbgQ9_bshd0L_BaJnLA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1488389626.44.0.569399484461.issue29686@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
If it is tagged for future releases, whoever choose to update their Python
version should expect code breaking and API changes, shouldn't them? I
don't see code breaking as an issue against this request.

On 1 March 2017 at 14:33, Raymond Hettinger <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:

>
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>
> It's too late to change this API.  As Serhiy says, it risks breaking code
> that is currently running and correct.
>
> Note the the __doc__ on functions is set to None when there is no
> docstring.  For better or worse, returning None is common in the Python
> world.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +rhettinger
> resolution:  -> rejected
> stage:  -> resolved
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29686>
> _______________________________________
>

-- 
Vinícius Dantas de Lima Melo
Graduando em Ciências e Tecnologia
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia (ECT)
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte
vinicius.gppcom@gmail.com viniciusdantas@bct.ect.ufrn.br
vinicius.dantasdelimamelo@mail.utoronto.ca | Celular/Mobile Phone: +1 647
447 5737
Skype: viniciusdantas01
History
Date User Action Args
2017-03-01 17:43:07viniciusdsetrecipients: + viniciusd, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
2017-03-01 17:43:07viniciusdlinkissue29686 messages
2017-03-01 17:43:07viniciusdcreate