Message288768
If it is tagged for future releases, whoever choose to update their Python
version should expect code breaking and API changes, shouldn't them? I
don't see code breaking as an issue against this request.
On 1 March 2017 at 14:33, Raymond Hettinger <report@bugs.python.org> wrote:
>
> Raymond Hettinger added the comment:
>
> It's too late to change this API. As Serhiy says, it risks breaking code
> that is currently running and correct.
>
> Note the the __doc__ on functions is set to None when there is no
> docstring. For better or worse, returning None is common in the Python
> world.
>
> ----------
> nosy: +rhettinger
> resolution: -> rejected
> stage: -> resolved
> status: open -> closed
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue29686>
> _______________________________________
>
--
Vinícius Dantas de Lima Melo
Graduando em Ciências e Tecnologia
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)
Escola de Ciências e Tecnologia (ECT)
Natal, Rio Grande do Norte
vinicius.gppcom@gmail.com viniciusdantas@bct.ect.ufrn.br
vinicius.dantasdelimamelo@mail.utoronto.ca | Celular/Mobile Phone: +1 647
447 5737
Skype: viniciusdantas01 |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2017-03-01 17:43:07 | viniciusd | set | recipients:
+ viniciusd, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
2017-03-01 17:43:07 | viniciusd | link | issue29686 messages |
2017-03-01 17:43:07 | viniciusd | create | |
|