This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author martin.panter
Recipients docs@python, eric.smith, lemburg, mark.dickinson, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, stutzbach
Date 2016-12-18.11:47:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1482061672.93.0.199568145867.issue29004@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
It seems I can write it without the escaped spaces. Is there a problem with this:

*x*:sup:`16` + *x*:sup:`12` + *x*:sup:`5` + 1

I’m happy to add the CRC-32 polynomial if you think it would be useful, although it is a lot longer (fifteen terms instead of four). And this CRC is already easily identified by the CRC-32 name. As well as the polynomial, there are other details that identify a CRC. The bits in CRC-32 are reversed and inverted compared to CRC-CCITT.

>>> hex(crc32(b"\x80", 0xFFFFFFFF) ^ 0xFFFFFFFF)
'0xedb88320'
# 0xEDB88320 is the reversed polynomial representation; the x^0 term corresponds to bit 31

Adler32 is not a CRC, and I don’t think there are multiple versions of the algorithm, so I don’t think it would need any special explanation.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-12-18 11:47:52martin.pantersetrecipients: + martin.panter, lemburg, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, stutzbach, docs@python, serhiy.storchaka
2016-12-18 11:47:52martin.pantersetmessageid: <1482061672.93.0.199568145867.issue29004@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-12-18 11:47:52martin.panterlinkissue29004 messages
2016-12-18 11:47:52martin.pantercreate