➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author terry.reedy
Recipients airwin, docs@python, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date 2016-11-12.01:00:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1478912403.39.0.841335284495.issue28614@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
n < (j-i)/k is a straightforward translation of i + n*k < j, and vice verse, where / is rational division.  It is incorrect to integerize the result and the doc does not say to do so.  In Python 3, there is no ambiguity, and the doc is *not* incorrect, and does not need to be changed.  In Python 2, I think it still clear enough, but we could add "(where / indicates rational division)'.  However, I also think this might be too nitpicky.  I am inclined to think that this should be closed.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-11-12 01:00:22terry.reedyunlinkissue28614 messages
2016-11-12 01:00:03terry.reedysetrecipients: + terry.reedy, r.david.murray, docs@python, airwin
2016-11-12 01:00:03terry.reedysetmessageid: <1478912403.39.0.841335284495.issue28614@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-11-12 01:00:03terry.reedylinkissue28614 messages
2016-11-12 01:00:03terry.reedycreate