➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author anfedorov
Recipients anfedorov, michael.foord, shmed
Date 2016-11-11.22:16:47
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH3wspm=r-qaJA9UFdGPnecRsqBNjSBeLt58AgKrCQAMTnw4UQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1478884088.82.0.173051232391.issue28569@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
There's some vagueness on how this is implemented, but I would prefer
manager.attach_mock to also work with whatever the return value of patch()
is.

On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Syed Suhail Ahmed <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> Syed Suhail Ahmed added the comment:
>
> So from what I have understood, manager.attach_mock must raise an
> Exception when it is called with a wrong attribute, since the patch is
> called with autospec=True and you cannot call a mock with non existing
> attributes.Is that correct?
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue28569>
> _______________________________________
>
History
Date User Action Args
2016-11-11 22:16:47anfedorovsetrecipients: + anfedorov, michael.foord, shmed
2016-11-11 22:16:47anfedorovlinkissue28569 messages
2016-11-11 22:16:47anfedorovcreate