Message275652
> That aspect of the change is clearly a bug fix
I am happy to *rule* that we can treat it as a bugfix, but I disagree
that it's *clearly* a bugfix. It's definitely debatable. This area of
the language is so obscure and so few people remember why it was done
the way that it's done that I expect that someone out there will be
unhappy about the change. But... change happens, so it's okay.
(Please don't respond arguing the "clearly" part, just go ahead and do it. :-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-09-10 16:42:22 | gvanrossum | set | recipients:
+ gvanrossum, ncoghlan, ned.deily, eric.snow, Martin.Teichmann |
2016-09-10 16:42:22 | gvanrossum | link | issue23722 messages |
2016-09-10 16:42:22 | gvanrossum | create | |
|