Message273616
> (Steve)> Doing the work to clean up the warnings really has to come second, ultimately.
> Second to what?
Second to enabling all the warnings, which is where the thread started. I need to break my nasty habit on here of not quoting posts, but it's such a pain when I'm on my phone (latest post is a long way away and selection never works properly in this text box for some reason).
I'd like to see the WinSock warnings fixed as there are security implications around them (no proven vulnerabilities, but the point of the new APIs is to make that even less likely). I already disabled other warnings that didn't have the same risks.
Adding more checks probably isn't a bad idea. MSVC doesn't entirely overlap with coverity, so it could find things they miss. But that would create work for someone to go fix them. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-08-25 01:21:18 | steve.dower | set | recipients:
+ steve.dower, loewis, terry.reedy, paul.moore, christian.heimes, tim.golden, r.david.murray, BreamoreBoy, zach.ware, Alexander Riccio |
2016-08-25 01:21:17 | steve.dower | set | messageid: <1472088077.96.0.0915564051228.issue25847@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-08-25 01:21:17 | steve.dower | link | issue25847 messages |
2016-08-25 01:21:17 | steve.dower | create | |
|