This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author yselivanov
Recipients gvanrossum, j1m, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2016-06-29.15:05:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1467212710.14.0.733442317541.issue27392@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> However, IMO, it's useful to be able to accept a connection outside of an asyncio event loop and then hand the loop the connected socket.

Looks like what you're asking for is a way to wrap existing socket object into a (transport, protocol) pair.  I'm -1 to add this new semantics to loop.create_connection, as I think it will complicate it too much.

However, we can consider adding something like 

   loop.wrap_socket(protocol_factory, sock) -> Transport
History
Date User Action Args
2016-06-29 15:05:10yselivanovsetrecipients: + yselivanov, gvanrossum, vstinner, j1m
2016-06-29 15:05:10yselivanovsetmessageid: <1467212710.14.0.733442317541.issue27392@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-06-29 15:05:10yselivanovlinkissue27392 messages
2016-06-29 15:05:09yselivanovcreate