Message269242
> People usually say it's because we don't have separate imaginary type, but we don't need it.
I think we do. Consider the case of something like -0 + 1j (the `repr` of complex(-0.0, 1.0)). That currently evaluates to `complex(0.0, 1.0)`, because the `-0.0` is combined with the `+0.0` real part of `1j`. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-25 15:17:51 | mark.dickinson | set | recipients:
+ mark.dickinson, r.david.murray, veky |
2016-06-25 15:17:51 | mark.dickinson | set | messageid: <1466867871.17.0.960817926468.issue27363@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-25 15:17:51 | mark.dickinson | link | issue27363 messages |
2016-06-25 15:17:50 | mark.dickinson | create | |
|