Message266986
I prefer your first solution because it seems to fit in better with how things were intended.
I can add in handling of partial writes with a deprecation warning when I get a chance. I guess the documentation would be something like “Since 3.5.2, partial writes are also handled, but this is deprecated.” |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-06-02 23:29:02 | martin.panter | set | recipients:
+ martin.panter, pje, pitrou, benjamin.peterson, tarek, stutzbach, serhiy.storchaka, jmadden, Jonathan Kamens, marcjofre, Paolo Veglia |
2016-06-02 23:29:02 | martin.panter | set | messageid: <1464910142.89.0.202340851873.issue24291@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-06-02 23:29:02 | martin.panter | link | issue24291 messages |
2016-06-02 23:29:02 | martin.panter | create | |
|