➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author vstinner
Recipients jstasiak, larry, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner, yselivanov
Date 2016-05-20.12:05:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1463745927.18.0.00474360242086.issue26814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> unpickle_list: 1.11x faster

This result was unfair: my fastcall branch contained the optimization of the issue #27056. I just pushed this optimization into the default branch.

I ran again the benchmark: the result is now "not significant", as expected, since the benchmark is a microbenchmark testing C functions of Modules/_pickle.c, it doesn't really rely on the performance of (C or Python) functions calls.
History
Date User Action Args
2016-05-20 12:05:27vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, larry, serhiy.storchaka, yselivanov, jstasiak
2016-05-20 12:05:27vstinnersetmessageid: <1463745927.18.0.00474360242086.issue26814@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-05-20 12:05:27vstinnerlinkissue26814 messages
2016-05-20 12:05:27vstinnercreate