Message 262478 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	martin.panter
Recipients	martin.panter, vstinner
Date	2016-03-26.00:51:24
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1458953484.6.0.717888282467.issue26612@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
In many cases I prefer “with” over “try / finally”. But Python 2’s sockets do not support “with” statements, so choice (2) is not possible for 2.7. I found one potential technical problem, and maybe some redundant close() calls in the review.

In many cases I prefer “with” over “try / finally”. But Python 2’s sockets do not support “with” statements, so choice (2) is not possible for 2.7.

I found one potential technical problem, and maybe some redundant close() calls in the review.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2016-03-26 00:51:24	martin.panter	set	recipients: + martin.panter, vstinner
2016-03-26 00:51:24	martin.panter	set	messageid: <1458953484.6.0.717888282467.issue26612@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2016-03-26 00:51:24	martin.panter	link	issue26612 messages
2016-03-26 00:51:24	martin.panter	create