Message261834
The basic model is this:
- a test can have a single outcome [yes, the api is ambiguous, but there it is]
- subtests let you identify multiple variations of a single test (note the id tweak etc) and *may* be reported differently
We certainly must not report the test as a whole passing if any subtest did not pass.
Long term I want to remove the error/failure partitioning of exceptions; its not actually useful.
The summary for the test, when subtests are used, should probably enumerate the states.
test_foo (3 passed, 2 skipped, 1 failure)
in much the same way the run as a whole is enumerated. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-03-15 23:04:23 | rbcollins | set | recipients:
+ rbcollins, pitrou, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, michael.foord, martin.panter, zach.ware |
2016-03-15 23:04:23 | rbcollins | set | messageid: <1458083063.68.0.12820040616.issue25894@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-03-15 23:04:23 | rbcollins | link | issue25894 messages |
2016-03-15 23:04:23 | rbcollins | create | |
|