Message258706
Patch looks good, but incomplete. Supporting __deepcopy__ (as a simple wrapper around __copy__ that ignores the second argument) would provide complete support.
Also, should there be tests? I mean, I assume the .copy() method itself is tested, but just to detect stupid regressions, seems like testing __copy__/__deepcopy__ for identical behavior would be a good thing. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | set | recipients:
+ josh.r, twouters, nadeem.vawda, serhiy.storchaka, introom |
2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | set | messageid: <1453313576.05.0.930183367959.issue25007@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | link | issue25007 messages |
2016-01-20 18:12:56 | josh.r | create | |
|