Message256895
> and the latter might give the impression it was some sort of special method/attribute when it was not.
Wouldn't adding this be special because it is specifically reserved by CPython as an implementation detail?
Also, would adding this name (__stub or __stub__) be sufficient to get this patch merged again. I would not mind investigating the gc_head issue after but I view that as a separate issue which is only exercised by this patch. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-12-23 02:44:57 | llllllllll | set | recipients:
+ llllllllll, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, taleinat, Arfrever, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, python-dev, martin.panter, serhiy.storchaka, josh.r |
2015-12-23 02:44:57 | llllllllll | set | messageid: <1450838697.64.0.13614370102.issue24379@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-12-23 02:44:57 | llllllllll | link | issue24379 messages |
2015-12-23 02:44:57 | llllllllll | create | |
|