Message256452
> With the pipe, there is still a potential race after the parent writes to the pipe and before sigwaitinfo() is invoked, versus the child sleep() call.
Yeah, I know, that's why I kept the ugly 100 ms sleep.
> What do you think of my suggestion to block the signal? Then (in theory) it should be robust, rather than relying on timing.
> https://bugs.python.org/issue25277#msg256278
I read your comment, but with this change, I'm not sure anymore that we test that sigwaitinfo() retries when it's interrupted by a signal (EINTR). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2015-12-15 10:42:36 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, python-dev, martin.panter, koobs, bapt |
2015-12-15 10:42:36 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1450176156.16.0.696592136116.issue25868@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2015-12-15 10:42:36 | vstinner | link | issue25868 messages |
2015-12-15 10:42:35 | vstinner | create | |
|