➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Francesco Biscani
Recipients Francesco Biscani, Saksham Agrawal, berker.peksag, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, lemburg, mark.dickinson, steven.daprano, stutzbach, tim.peters
Date 2015-10-22.16:29:31
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1445531372.07.0.368286557228.issue25453@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
@Mark

Yes I understand that this is a thorny issue. I was kinda hoping NumPy would just forward complex arithmetic to the underlying C implementation, but apparently that's not the case (which OTOH makes sense as the use of C99 complex numbers is not that widespread).

FWIW, the quoted section in the C standard (Annex G) contains the pseudocode for standard-conforming implementations of complex multiplication and division, in case the decision is taken to change the behaviour.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-10-22 16:29:32Francesco Biscanisetrecipients: + Francesco Biscani, lemburg, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, eric.smith, stutzbach, ezio.melotti, steven.daprano, berker.peksag, Saksham Agrawal
2015-10-22 16:29:32Francesco Biscanisetmessageid: <1445531372.07.0.368286557228.issue25453@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-10-22 16:29:32Francesco Biscanilinkissue25453 messages
2015-10-22 16:29:31Francesco Biscanicreate