This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author rhettinger
Recipients abarry, eric.snow, lig, r.david.murray, rhettinger, zach.ware
Date 2015-10-08.00:27:50
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1444264070.78.0.240028589578.issue25315@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
In general, the __attributes and _attributes are already considered to be private, so I don't see the point.  Aside from this one user that is never been necessary and he already knows that it doesn't work. 

Re-reading the thread, the issue isn't that he doesn't like the design choice, not that he didn't understand it.

The collections module isn't the only place the implementation has been made private (see fractions.py) for example.   Maybe a general note in the docs about private APIs or a FAQ entry would be appropriate, but there isn't anything specific to OrderedDicts (especially now that there is a C implementation, it should go without saying).
History
Date User Action Args
2015-10-08 00:27:50rhettingersetrecipients: + rhettinger, r.david.murray, eric.snow, zach.ware, abarry, lig
2015-10-08 00:27:50rhettingersetmessageid: <1444264070.78.0.240028589578.issue25315@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-10-08 00:27:50rhettingerlinkissue25315 messages
2015-10-08 00:27:50rhettingercreate