This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author brett.cannon
Recipients brett.cannon, florin.papa, pitrou, r.david.murray
Date 2015-08-28.19:00:39
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1440788439.93.0.690635334057.issue24934@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Changeset 2f3b3c6c1190 adds the version range check to django_v2 to block it past 3.5.

I didn't add the django_v3 quite yet because I didn't realize that Django 1.8 won't work without being manually patched by us (I thought that issue was limited to our Django 1.5 copy). I did check and the issue is fixed in Django 1.9 which is due before the end of the year: https://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/Version1.9Roadmap .

Since this is for Python 3.6 which is in no way close to coming out I say we simply wait until Django 1.9.0 is released and then introduce django_v3 without having to keep our own patched version of Django around.
History
Date User Action Args
2015-08-28 19:00:39brett.cannonsetrecipients: + brett.cannon, pitrou, r.david.murray, florin.papa
2015-08-28 19:00:39brett.cannonsetmessageid: <1440788439.93.0.690635334057.issue24934@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-08-28 19:00:39brett.cannonlinkissue24934 messages
2015-08-28 19:00:39brett.cannoncreate