Message 249222 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	matheus.v.portela
Recipients	Netto, aht, amaury.forgeotdarc, eric.araujo, matheus.v.portela, pitrou, r.david.murray, vincent.legoll, vlegoll
Date	2015-08-27.03:23:51
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1440645832.76.0.305031902271.issue3548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Let me check whether I understood you suggestion... What you are saying is that it is already possible to pipeline shell commands through subprocess, such as in the following line? subprocess.call('ls -l \| grep Music', shell=True) However, this requires the command to be executed in a shell environment. Hence, it would be a good idea to extend it to non-shell command execution. Is this right?

Let me check whether I understood you suggestion...

What you are saying is that it is already possible to pipeline shell commands through subprocess, such as in the following line?

subprocess.call('ls -l | grep Music', shell=True)

However, this requires the command to be executed in a shell environment. Hence, it would be a good idea to extend it to non-shell command execution. Is this right?

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2015-08-27 03:23:52	matheus.v.portela	set	recipients: + matheus.v.portela, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, vlegoll, eric.araujo, vincent.legoll, r.david.murray, aht, Netto
2015-08-27 03:23:52	matheus.v.portela	set	messageid: <1440645832.76.0.305031902271.issue3548@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2015-08-27 03:23:52	matheus.v.portela	link	issue3548 messages
2015-08-27 03:23:51	matheus.v.portela	create