➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Tiago Wright
Recipients Tiago Wright, peter.otten, r.david.murray, skip.montanaro
Date 2015-08-07.00:45:49
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAFxr9VpV5qxZ7H1Gzn_a5u63F1WVJsaXmse0EFv78sV4G_9jHA@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1438889398.02.0.682124444366.issue24787@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
I've run the Sniffer against the same data set, but varied the size of the
sample given to the code. It seems that feeding it more data actually seems
to make the results less accurate. Table attached.
On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 12:29 PM R. David Murray <report@bugs.python.org>
wrote:

>
> R. David Murray added the comment:
>
> Yes, much better :)
>
> ----------
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue24787>
> _______________________________________
>
Files
File name Uploaded
csvsniffertest5.txt Tiago Wright, 2015-08-07.00:45:47
History
Date User Action Args
2015-08-07 00:45:51Tiago Wrightsetrecipients: + Tiago Wright, skip.montanaro, peter.otten, r.david.murray
2015-08-07 00:45:50Tiago Wrightlinkissue24787 messages
2015-08-07 00:45:49Tiago Wrightcreate